|
Post by Randy Orton on Aug 31, 2009 13:59:13 GMT -5
I have noticed here that with the current format we are using of holding PPV's two days after Anarchy, that everyone isn't able to put in there best work. I think the reason for that is the fact that everyone is RPing for Anarchy which comes first and then, if they are able, try to do an RP for the PPV.
I have seen a number of feds that skip the weekly show on weeks of a PPV. I think this is a great idea, and improves a PPV tremendously. When someone is building a feud or even just preparing for a big PPV match, it would be excellent to have a whole week to focus entirely on the PPV.
I think this would obviously increase people's performance for a PPV, while at the same time easing the burden of management. I was also against two brands, and it was put to a poll. I think then at the very least we should submit this idea to a poll.
I am in no way insinuating that I'm this smart guy who came up with a great idea. As I said I have seen it done this way in many feds. I just think it would be easier and in no way harm the fed. I am confident the result of switching to this way of doing things would make FCW PPV's more epic than ever.
|
|
|
Post by Vince Osborn on Aug 31, 2009 21:13:32 GMT -5
Ya I have also seen other feds use this method. I agree this seems very legit. You have my vote
|
|
|
Post by Randy Orton on Aug 31, 2009 21:20:24 GMT -5
Thanks Vince. At worst if it didn't end up making a big difference, I don't see any way it could have negative results.
|
|
|
Post by The Edgecrusher on Aug 31, 2009 23:27:17 GMT -5
I'd agree. At the least make sure anarchy is just guys who aren't wrestling in the PPV.
|
|
|
Post by William McConnell on Aug 31, 2009 23:35:18 GMT -5
Yeah, I was wondering about that myself, actually. I noticed you had Anarchy right up to the near end of the month and then bam, PPV in 2 days. I may be new to FCW so my word my not hold much, but I think Randy's got the right idea.
|
|
|
Post by Randy Orton on Sept 1, 2009 22:43:57 GMT -5
Boss?
|
|
|
Post by The Boss on Sept 1, 2009 23:03:34 GMT -5
Sorry I'd posted on here earlier but at the time my internet was kind of messing up and apparently it didn't work, anyway this was what I'd initially intended for the site however, it seemed to be confusing people for some reason. But given the positive reception Orton's suggestion has had and the lack in roleplaying for the recent ppv I see no harm in giving it at least a try this month.
|
|
Blade LaVigne
Anarchy Superstar
FCW Original
THE FUTURE 8-6
Posts: 345
|
Post by Blade LaVigne on Sept 2, 2009 8:04:02 GMT -5
I like the idea.
|
|
Eggman
Anarchy Superstar
Posts: 25
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 2, 2009 21:36:30 GMT -5
I've been in other feds where it was done exactly the way Randy Orton's suggesting, and it worked perfectly.
Edgecrusher's sugggestion has a lot of merit, too, since those not on the PPV card would have a chance to work on their own storylines and angles, while thosae on the PPV card could concentrate on that instead of worrying about both cards.
|
|
|
Post by William McConnell on Sept 2, 2009 22:42:26 GMT -5
So have two cards on PPV weeks?
|
|